One of the challenges of countries having various races, on one hand is local people tendencytoward respecting their local particularism (regional cultural characteristics) by thecentral government, and on the other hand is taking local internal affairs administration by themselves. If central power cannot, in stable conditions, guide this tendency well, and provide integration and national consensusfield, in instable conditions, disintegration field of the country will be provided. In historical background of our country, both experiences have been existed: in stable conditions of central power, not only integration has been in its climax, but far countries have also attached to Guarded states and “United States of Iran”, and have founded a commonwealthsystem (sample of Satrap of Achaemenid), but in weakness conditions of central power and foreign invasion such as Alexander of Macedon,Moguls, Ottomans, …, the country has been decomposed. Decomposition of Safavid Dynasty and dynasties after that till Pahlavi era and “administrating of local public affairs with three different approaches” (centralization, deconcentration, and nearly federal) is a contemplative experience, which willnot be as a pattern, but will be useful for future of Iran country as a lead for enforcing theoretical and practical principles of administrating local affairs. \nIn this paper, collecting information is done based on “documentary study”. In a more obvious term, research methodology in this article is historical research and survey method with analytical-descriptive approach: in this respect, at first by using sources with high validity, accidents and incidentsare described, and then these accidents and incidentsare analyzed, and finally new information and contents will be provided that will give us new achievements in this field which might be considered as modern contribution in the field of country organizing.

Introduction: Structural equation modeling is a statistical methodology that takes a confirmatory approach to the multivariate analysis of a structural theory on some phenomena. This theory particularly represents causal process that generates observations on multiple variables. The structural equation modeling is a more powerful technique than the other multivariate techniques (e.g., logistic regression, factor analysis etc) to test whether associations were consistent across cultural groups after taking into account the relevant medical and demographic factors which might explain the disparities in Quality of Life of breast cancer survivors (BCR). \n\nMethods: All the female breast cancer survivors (1186) registered at INMOL, SKMCH and Meo hospital (Major cancer hospitals of Punjab located at Lahore) during the period of April, 2006 to March, 2009 were interviewed. A self administrated socio-demographic Performa and a modified version of Quality of Life Cancer Survivors (QOL-CS) tool was used. \n\nResults: Structural model for overall QOL was fitted on the BCR data. The most contributing domain of breast cancer survivor’s quality of life was ‘Physical domain’ which showed that it had ‘large effect’ on quality of life after the Social domain. Impact of demographic variables was also checked on domains and overall quality of life model. In demographic variables, Diagnosis age, BMI and Age at menstruation had greater influence on quality of life of survivors. Fatigue, aches and pain, Weakness and Problems in moving around were the most contributing factors of Physical domain of Survivor’s quality of life. In Social domain, Isolation and Financial difficulties were the most highlighted items affecting survivor’s Quality of Life. Change in self concept as women, Distress at initial diagnosing or during Chemotherapy, Useful for family and Feelings about normality of life were the most contributing psychological items on survivor’s quality of life.